What the panel ordered
Petition for Reconsideration dismissed
Petition for Reconsideration filed by Applicant in pro per, dismissed as skeletal and unsupported by specific references to the record or law
What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
The petition was dismissed because it was skeletal, failed to state grounds for reconsideration, and lacked specific references to the record or law as required by Labor Code section 5902 and WCAB Rules.
From the decision · page 1Applicant dismissed her attorney and filed a Petition for Reconsideration, in pro per, on February 19, 2021. We have considered the allegations of the Petition for Reconsideration and the contents of the report of the workers' compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) with respect thereto. Based on our review of the record, the petition will be dismissed as skeletal.
The facts that decided it
What the panel treated as outcome-determinative, and which side it favoured.