What the panel ordered
Petition for Removal dismissed as moot because subpoenas were executed and records delivered prior to petition to quash; other issues to be addressed by trial court
Petition for Removal filed by applicant challenging an Order Quashing Subpoenas Duces Tecum dated 08/26/2021 in two cases, but petition included 5813 remedies in six cases, bypassing trial court level
What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
The order to quash was moot because the subpoenas were executed and records delivered before the petition to quash was filed, so the petition for removal is also moot and must be dismissed.
From the decision · page 3The subpoena(s) were executed and petitioner received the records. The petition to quash was issued post-delivery of the requested records. Therefore the order to quash is moot, and by operation of law, the petition to remove the order to quash is also moot, as doing so would have no effect on the parties' discovery status.
The facts that decided it
What the panel treated as outcome-determinative, and which side it favoured.