What the panel ordered
Petition for removal dismissed as moot and matter returned to trial level for trial setting.
Lien claimant filed a petition for removal from the order of continuance issued by the WCJ on December 10, 2025.
What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
The petition for removal was dismissed as moot because the issue raised was resolved by the WCJ's order setting the matter for trial.
From the decision · page 1Lien claimant, Michael Blott, D.C., has filed a petition for removal from the order of continuance issued on December 10, 2025, by the workers' compensation administrative law judge (WCJ). Lien claimant argues that the matter should proceed to trial.
The facts that decided it
What the panel treated as outcome-determinative, and which side it favoured.
Lien claimant filed a petition for removal from the order of continuance issued on December 10, 2025.