What the panel ordered
Petition for removal granted, order quashing subpoena rescinded, matter returned to trial level for further proceedings
Petition for removal from order quashing applicant's subpoena filed by applicant, WCJ issued order quashing subpoena, WCJ filed Report and Recommendation on Petition for Removal
What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
The Appeals Board found that the WCJ's order quashing the subpoena was issued without a record in support, and that removal was warranted to create a proper record and prevent substantial prejudice or irreparable harm to the applicant.
From the decision · page 1Applicant has filed a petition for removal from the order quashing applicant's subpoena issued on June 2, 2025, by the workers' compensation administrative law judge (WCJ), and served by defendant on November 5, 2025.1
The facts that decided it
What the panel treated as outcome-determinative, and which side it favoured.