What the panel ordered
Petition for Reconsideration granted; Findings and Order affirmed as amended to clarify that SIBTF claim is untimely filed under case law (no statute of limitations)p. 6
Petition for Reconsideration from WCJ's February 2, 2024 Findings and Order finding SIBTF claim untimely
This docket was decided more than once. Shown here is the latest released decision; we also hold July 10, 2023.
What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
Applicant knew or could reasonably be deemed to know of substantial likelihood of SIBTF eligibility by August 1, 2011 (Dr. Gross report), more than three years before the five-year limitations period from April 29, 2010 injury
From the decision · page 5Accordingly, for these reasons, we concur with the WCJ that applicant’s SIBTF claim is untimely. We grant reconsideration solely to amend Finding no. 4 to reflect that there is no statute of limitations governing SIBTF claims.