What the panel ordered
Petition for Reconsideration denied; June 9, 2025 FA&O upheld.
Defendant sought reconsideration of the June 9, 2025 Findings, Award, and Order (FA&O) regarding temporary disability indemnity and work restrictions.
What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
The Appeals Board found that the work restriction by Dr. Orlin to be placed near a bathroom constituted a valid work restriction for temporary disability indemnity purposes, and defendant did not show that modified work was available or offered, entitling applicant to temporary disability indemnity.
The facts that decided it
What the panel treated as outcome-determinative, and which side it favoured.
Dr. Orlin's work restriction to be placed near a bathroom due to urinary frequency and urgency was found valid for temporary disability indemnity purposes.
Favours Applicant prevailed
This restriction supported the finding that applicant was temporarily disabled and entitled to indemnity.