The whole released corpus, not the closest twelve. Filter by issue and outcome, kind, year, office, Labor Code section, or holding. Each row is the ADJ number, the disposition with its page, and the official PDF. To search by a fact pattern, use /explore.
Can I browse all released California WCAB panel decisions?+−
Yes. This list is the released corpus, filterable by issue and outcome, kind, year, district office, Labor Code section, or holding. Each row is the ADJ number, disposition, and official PDF — not a claimant name.
Should I search by facts instead?+−
If you have a dispute to paste, use /explore. This page is for scanning or filtering the whole set, not ranking by similarity.
Why is an older panel missing?+−
Most of the ordinary panel archive here starts in 2021. En banc files go further back. Coverage and the gaps are listed on /california/coverage. Filtered views are not separate indexable pages.
Published panel decisions, almost all since 2021: the litigated tail of a system that mostly settles. Issues and outcomes were extracted by AI and released only where the source passage checked. A row is a decision, never a claimant. Not legal advice.
The WCAB vacated the December 17, 2021 order granting the petitions, dismissed the petitions for reconsideration, and denied the petitions for removal.
The WCJ's Findings and Order of April 22, 2022 is rescinded and substituted with a Finding that Zurich has not filed a petition for contribution, making prior timeliness and estoppel determinations premature.
Findings and Orders issued by WCJ on May 10, 2021, are affirmed by WCAB on January 13, 2022, denying applicant's claims of injury to psyche, nervous system, sexual dysfunction, sleep disorder, low back, left knee, left ankle, and new and further disability.
The Findings of Fact, Award and Opinion on Decision issued by the WCJ on May 11, 2021 is rescinded and the matter is returned to the trial level for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
WCAB affirms WCJ Findings and Order dated 2019-09-24 except amended to find lien claimant MH Express did not meet burden of proof for entitlement to payment for certain dates of service; retrospective utilization review ordered only for 5/11/15 date of service; lien claimant to take nothing for other disputed dates
The en banc decision of April 20, 2011, holding that non-MPN medical reports are inadmissible where unauthorized treatment is obtained outside a validly established and properly noticed MPN, is affirmed. Petition for reconsideration by applicant is denied. Petition for reconsideration/removal by Saldivar is dismissed.
The Findings and Award of July 29, 2010, are rescinded and the matter is remanded to the trial level for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
The Appeals Board reversed the WCJ's finding that the applicant rebutted the presumptive validity of the 2005 PDRS and remanded for further proceedings including rating under the 2005 PDRS.