The whole released corpus, not the closest twelve. Filter by issue and outcome, kind, year, office, Labor Code section, or holding. Each row is the ADJ number, the disposition with its page, and the official PDF. To search by a fact pattern, use /explore.
Can I browse all released California WCAB panel decisions?+−
Yes. This list is the released corpus, filterable by issue and outcome, kind, year, district office, Labor Code section, or holding. Each row is the ADJ number, disposition, and official PDF — not a claimant name.
Should I search by facts instead?+−
If you have a dispute to paste, use /explore. This page is for scanning or filtering the whole set, not ranking by similarity.
Why is an older panel missing?+−
Most of the ordinary panel archive here starts in 2021. En banc files go further back. Coverage and the gaps are listed on /california/coverage. Filtered views are not separate indexable pages.
Published panel decisions, almost all since 2021: the litigated tail of a system that mostly settles. Issues and outcomes were extracted by AI and released only where the source passage checked. A row is a decision, never a claimant. Not legal advice.
The Board grants reconsideration, rescinds the Order Dismissing Case, and returns the matter to the WCJ for further proceedings consistent with the decision.
Order allowing certain documents to be emailed directly to the Appeals Board and district offices during the applicant-19 state of emergency, overriding prior rule prohibiting email filings.
February 27, 2014 en banc decision rescinded; Petition for Reconsideration filed by applicant denied; September 20, 2013 Findings and Order of WCJ affirmed
The Appeals Board rescinded the WCJ's February 18, 2014 dismissal of the IMR appeal for lack of verification and returned the case to the trial level for further proceedings and a new decision by the WCJ.
The WCAB en banc rescinded the WCJ's September 23, 2013 decision and returned the matter to the WCJ for further proceedings to determine whether the spinal surgery is reasonably required.
The Appeals Board affirmed the May 8, 2003 Supplemental Findings and Award of the WCJ, confirming the correct legal identity of the employer as 'Erez Boostan, an individual and dba American Runner Attorney Service' and denying UEF's petition for reconsideration.