The whole released corpus, not the closest twelve. Filter by issue and outcome, kind, year, office, Labor Code section, or holding. Each row is the ADJ number, the disposition with its page, and the official PDF. To search by a fact pattern, use /explore.
The Appeals Board denied the defendant's petition for removal, finding no substantial prejudice or irreparable harm and that reconsideration would be an adequate remedy if the matter proceeds to a final adverse decision.
Can I browse all released California WCAB panel decisions?+−
Yes. This list is the released corpus, filterable by issue and outcome, kind, year, district office, Labor Code section, or holding. Each row is the ADJ number, disposition, and official PDF — not a claimant name.
Should I search by facts instead?+−
If you have a dispute to paste, use /explore. This page is for scanning or filtering the whole set, not ranking by similarity.
Why is an older panel missing?+−
Most of the ordinary panel archive here starts in 2021. En banc files go further back. Coverage and the gaps are listed on /california/coverage. Filtered views are not separate indexable pages.
Published panel decisions, almost all since 2021: the litigated tail of a system that mostly settles. Issues and outcomes were extracted by AI and released only where the source passage checked. A row is a decision, never a claimant. Not legal advice.
Petition for Reconsideration granted; Notice of Intention to rescind the January 15, 2026 decision unless required documents filed in EAMS within 30 days
Petition for removal granted; order compelling applicant's deposition issued on March 27, 2025, rescinded; matter returned to trial level for further proceedings
The Board granted the Petition for Reconsideration, rescinded the June 2, 2025 Findings and Order, and substituted a new order correcting occupational group number and clerical errors, but denied the Petition to Set Aside the Stipulations with Request for Award.
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the Petition for Reconsideration as premature and returned the matter to the WCJ to treat the petition as a petition to set aside the Order and set a hearing for applicant to provide evidence.
Petition for Reconsideration is dismissed as premature and the matter is returned to the trial level for consideration as a petition to set aside the OACR.
Petition for Reconsideration dismissed as premature for lack of evidence; matter returned to trial level for hearing on petition to set aside stipulations with request for award.
The Appeals Board dismissed the Petition for Reconsideration to allow the WCJ to treat it as a set aside petition and conduct further proceedings consistent with the decision.