The whole released corpus, not the closest twelve. Filter by issue and outcome, kind, year, office, Labor Code section, or holding. Each row is the ADJ number, the disposition with its page, and the official PDF. To search by a fact pattern, use /explore.
Released decisions
5,374
Matching these filters
11
Page
1 of 1
Released decisions11 of 5,374
Decision
Issues · outcome
Disposition
Open
ADJ10713497 →Dec 10, 2025 · Santa BarbaraDecision and order
Can I browse all released California WCAB panel decisions?+−
Yes. This list is the released corpus, filterable by issue and outcome, kind, year, district office, Labor Code section, or holding. Each row is the ADJ number, disposition, and official PDF — not a claimant name.
Should I search by facts instead?+−
If you have a dispute to paste, use /explore. This page is for scanning or filtering the whole set, not ranking by similarity.
Why is an older panel missing?+−
Most of the ordinary panel archive here starts in 2021. En banc files go further back. Coverage and the gaps are listed on /california/coverage. Filtered views are not separate indexable pages.
Published panel decisions, almost all since 2021: the litigated tail of a system that mostly settles. Issues and outcomes were extracted by AI and released only where the source passage checked. A row is a decision, never a claimant. Not legal advice.
Reconsideration granted; WCJ decision affirmed as amended to add § 5412 date of injury of August 14, 2023 and to find claim not barred by post-termination defensep. 1
Petition for reconsideration granted; WCJ findings affirmed except amended to hold defendant had the right to select Dr. Nguyen as QME and its selection is validp. 7
Petition for Reconsideration granted; WCJ’s finding that applicant is entitled to a replacement QME panel reversed; applicant’s request for replacement QME panel deniedp. 1
Rescinded WCJ's Findings of Fact and Order; substituted new findings that claim is not barred by §§ 3600(a)(4) or 4053; all other issues deferred; matter returned to trial level for further development of the recordp. 2
Petition for Reconsideration granted; Findings and Order affirmed as amended to clarify that SIBTF claim is untimely filed under case law (no statute of limitations)p. 6