The whole released corpus, not the closest twelve. Filter by issue and outcome, kind, year, office, Labor Code section, or holding. Each row is the ADJ number, the disposition with its page, and the official PDF. To search by a fact pattern, use /explore.
The Appeals Board granted the Petition for Reconsideration and deferred issuance of a final decision pending further review of the merits and the entire record.
Can I browse all released California WCAB panel decisions?+−
Yes. This list is the released corpus, filterable by issue and outcome, kind, year, district office, Labor Code section, or holding. Each row is the ADJ number, disposition, and official PDF — not a claimant name.
Should I search by facts instead?+−
If you have a dispute to paste, use /explore. This page is for scanning or filtering the whole set, not ranking by similarity.
Why is an older panel missing?+−
Most of the ordinary panel archive here starts in 2021. En banc files go further back. Coverage and the gaps are listed on /california/coverage. Filtered views are not separate indexable pages.
Published panel decisions, almost all since 2021: the litigated tail of a system that mostly settles. Issues and outcomes were extracted by AI and released only where the source passage checked. A row is a decision, never a claimant. Not legal advice.
The WCJ's November 23, 2022 Findings of Fact were rescinded and the matter was returned to the trial level for further proceedings consistent with the decision after reconsideration.
The Appeals Board granted the Petition for Reconsideration, rescinded the Findings and Order of March 4, 2026, and returned the matter to the trial level for further proceedings consistent with the decision.
Petitions for Reconsideration granted; November 21, 2025 Findings and Award affirmed except amended Finding of Fact No. 14 and amended award of attorney's fees to lien claimant.
Defendant's Petition for Reconsideration is granted. Final decision after reconsideration is deferred pending further review of the merits and consideration of the entire record.
The Appeals Board denied defendant's Petition for Reconsideration, upholding the WCJ's Findings and Award that the utilization review decision was untimely and the requested inpatient rehabilitation treatment was reasonable and medically necessary.
Petition for Reconsideration is granted; the December 7, 2023 Findings of Fact, Order; Opinion on Decision is rescinded and substituted with findings that defendant failed to meet its burden to show a change of circumstances warranting discontinuation of inpatient treatment; all other issues are deferred.
Petition for Reconsideration denied by the Appeals Board panel on November 27, 2023, affirming the WCJ's finding that Applicant failed to prove medical necessity of the disputed treatment in the October 28, 2021 RFA.
Petition for reconsideration granted; July 3, 2023 Findings and Award amended to find defendant did not timely defer utilization review upon receiving two medical reports with requests for authorization.
Petition for Reconsideration is denied, affirming the WCJ's findings that the utilization review determination was untimely and that the requested outpatient rehabilitation program is reasonable and necessary.
The WCAB rescinded the February 7, 2022 Findings and Award and substituted new findings denying the September 13, 2021 Request for Authorization and finding no requirement for utilization review; applicant is not entitled to the Functional Restoration Program at defendant's expense.
The Appeals Board rescinded the WCJ's Findings of Fact and Award in its entirety and issued a new decision awarding reimbursement for prescriptions recommended by Dr. Grace Reid on June 20, 2019 and July 15, 2019, but rescinded the award for medical mileage expenses. The Board ordered further record development on other disputed prescription expenses.
Findings and Order issued November 15, 2019, rescinded; new decision finds all UR decisions timely, denies penalties under Labor Code section 5814 and attorney's fees under section 5814.5; awards medical treatment to cure or relieve injury effects.
Petition for Reconsideration granted in part to amend findings regarding defendant's standing and to include the 90-day period for home health care; otherwise, the Findings and Award of July 13, 2021, affirmed.
WCAB panel affirmed the WCJ's decision denying the petition for reconsideration and confirming reimbursement to CIGA for bill review and utilization review expenses as part of medical treatment costs.
The WCAB panel granted reconsideration, amended the WCJ's decision to clarify entitlement to completion of care outside defendant's MPN, and otherwise affirmed the WCJ's Findings and Award.
The WCAB affirms the WCJ's Findings of Fact, Award, Order and Opinion on Decision issued February 13, 2020, denying the requested right knee surgery treatment as not established medically necessary.
February 27, 2014 en banc decision rescinded; Petition for Reconsideration filed by applicant denied; September 20, 2013 Findings and Order of WCJ affirmed
The Appeals Board rescinded the May 6, 2004 WCJ decision and remanded the matter to the WCJ to allow the defendant a reasonable time to initiate the AME/QME procedure and for the WCJ to redetermine the applicant's entitlement to right shoulder surgery after completion of the AME/QME procedure.
WCJ's July 21, 2004 Findings and Award and Order rescinded; matter remanded to trial level for further proceedings and new decision consistent with en banc opinionp. 13